Sandbox: Difference between revisions
From Hard Drop Tetris Wiki
m (ext link test) |
m (→External Links) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_kw=Radica+Family+Tetris | *http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_kw=Radica+Family+Tetris | ||
*http://tinyurl.com/p2s7lk2 | *http://tinyurl.com/p2s7lk2 | ||
*[http://nullpo.it.cx/ Nullpomino website] | |||
*[http://nullpomino.googlecode.com/files/NullpoMino7.5.0.exe Latest version download link (Windows installer)] | |||
*[http://harddrop.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=2035 Hard Drop thread] | |||
*[http://code.google.com/p/nullpomino/ Google code project page] | |||
*[http://harddrop.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=2317 Nullpomino guide] | |||
Revision as of 20:46, 16 October 2015
| Pros | Cons | |
|---|---|---|
| "It takes very few keystrokes to set each piece in place, and you can even take advantage of DAS/ARR repeat across pieces for the OIL." - Larrytetris. | They are impractical and dangerous in modern multiplayer and will always remain an outside quirk of a blanket rule, in my book. The stack for them is not flat, and for the number of lines taken to do one (including the high overhang, which is I assume easy to get spiked on), their send-attack ratio is poor. With the number of pieces used, a normal t-spin double is nearly always better, and a tetris cleaner and less risky." - Paul676 | |
| Example 2a | Example 2b |