From Hard Drop Tetris Wiki
PandaEDIT158 (talk | contribs) m (→C-Spin Opener: spelling mistake) |
PandaEDIT158 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 319: | Line 319: | ||
One may assemble the C-Spin Perfect Clear using the TOJ Core. | One may assemble the C-Spin Perfect Clear using the TOJ Core. | ||
* O → ZL | * O → ZL (PC rate: 95.00%): This form has better Perfect Clear solutions than the ZST Core C-Spin since the chance of doing a T-Spin Double before Perfect Clear is significantly better. | ||
{| | {| | ||
Line 430: | Line 430: | ||
{{pfrow|G|T|T|T|G|G|G|G|G|G}} | {{pfrow|G|T|T|T|G|G|G|G|G|G}} | ||
{{pfrow|G|G|T|G|G|G|G|G|G|G}} | {{pfrow|G|G|T|G|G|G|G|G|G|G}} | ||
{{pfend}} | |||
|{{pfstart}} | |||
{{pfrow| | | | | | | | | | }} | |||
{{pfrow|O|O|J|J|Z|G|G|Z|Z|L}} | |||
{{pfrow|O|O|J|Z|Z|G|G|L|L|L}} | |||
{{pfrow|G|G|T|Z|G|G|G|G|Z|Z}} | |||
{{pfrow|G|T|T|T|G|G|G|G|G|G}} | |||
{{pfrow|G|G|J|G|G|G|G|G|G|G}} | |||
{{pfend}} | {{pfend}} | ||
|{{pfstart}} | |{{pfstart}} | ||
Line 449: | Line 457: | ||
|} | |} | ||
* L → I | * L → I (PC rate: 94.09%) | ||
{| | {| | ||
Line 479: | Line 487: | ||
{{pfrow| | | | | | | | | | }} | {{pfrow| | | | | | | | | | }} | ||
{{pfrow| | | | | | | | | | }} | {{pfrow| | | | | | | | | | }} | ||
{{pfrow|G|G| | {{pfrow|G|G|L|L|L|J|J|J|I|G}} | ||
{{pfrow|G|G| | {{pfrow|G|G|L|S|S|O|O|J|I|G}} | ||
{{pfrow|G|G| | {{pfrow|G|G|S|S|G|O|O|G|I|G}} | ||
{{pfrow|G|T|T|T|G|G|G|G|I|G}} | {{pfrow|G|T|T|T|G|G|G|G|I|G}} | ||
{{pfrow|G|G|T|G|G|G|G|G|G|G}} | {{pfrow|G|G|T|G|G|G|G|G|G|G}} | ||
Line 490: | Line 498: | ||
{{pfrow| | | | | | | | | | }} | {{pfrow| | | | | | | | | | }} | ||
{{pfrow| | | | | | | | | | }} | {{pfrow| | | | | | | | | | }} | ||
{{pfrow|G|G| | {{pfrow|G|G|J|J|Z|I|I|I|I|G}} | ||
{{pfrow|G|G| | {{pfrow|G|G|J|Z|Z|O|O|L|L|G}} | ||
{{pfrow|G|G| | {{pfrow|G|G|J|Z|G|O|O|G|L|G}} | ||
{{pfrow|G|T|T|T|G|G|G|G| | {{pfrow|G|T|T|T|G|G|G|G|L|G}} | ||
{{pfrow|G|G|T|G|G|G|G|G|G|G}} | {{pfrow|G|G|T|G|G|G|G|G|G|G}} | ||
{{pfend}} | {{pfend}} | ||
Line 501: | Line 509: | ||
{{pfrow| | | | | | | | | | }} | {{pfrow| | | | | | | | | | }} | ||
{{pfrow| | | | | | | | | | }} | {{pfrow| | | | | | | | | | }} | ||
{{pfrow|G|G|L|L|L | {{pfrow|G|G|J|J|J|L|L|L|I|G}} | ||
{{pfrow|G|G|L|S|S | {{pfrow|G|G|O|O|J|L|S|S|I|G}} | ||
{{pfrow|G|G| | {{pfrow|G|G|O|O|G|S|S|G|I|G}} | ||
{{pfrow|G|T|T|T|G|G|G|G|I|G}} | {{pfrow|G|T|T|T|G|G|G|G|I|G}} | ||
{{pfrow|G|G|T|G|G|G|G|G|G|G}} | {{pfrow|G|G|T|G|G|G|G|G|G|G}} | ||
Line 512: | Line 520: | ||
{{pfrow| | | | | | | | | | }} | {{pfrow| | | | | | | | | | }} | ||
{{pfrow| | | | | | | | | | }} | {{pfrow| | | | | | | | | | }} | ||
{{pfrow|G|G|J|J|Z| | {{pfrow|G|G|J|J|Z|L|L|L|I|G}} | ||
{{pfrow|G|G|J|Z|Z| | {{pfrow|G|G|J|Z|Z|L|S|S|I|G}} | ||
{{pfrow|G|G|J|Z|G| | {{pfrow|G|G|J|Z|G|S|S|G|I|G}} | ||
{{pfrow|G|T|T|T|G|G|G|G| | {{pfrow|G|T|T|T|G|G|G|G|I|G}} | ||
{{pfrow|G|G|T|G|G|G|G|G|G|G}} | {{pfrow|G|G|T|G|G|G|G|G|G|G}} | ||
{{pfend}} | {{pfend}} |
Revision as of 05:06, 10 May 2021
The C-Spin (TKI積み) is a kind of Triple Double Attack. It is invented by TKI. This name is given because of the "C" shape that is formed by the J and L. As the name suggests, it results in a T-Spin Triple which is usually followed by a T-Spin Double within three bags. As an opener, it is most often built with an ZST core whereas L and J are used to build the overhang.
C-Spin Opener
First Bag
ZST Core |
TOJ Core |
IST Core (OJ varies) |
Second and later bags
For the TOJ and ITS Cores, the placement of the second bag is fixed while for the ZST Core, it is stacked ad-lib. However, if it is used for Perfect Clear continuations, then case differentiations are present.
- ZST Core: There is no fixed way of stacking the second bag, so a player must stack ad-lib. However, if the Z piece can be placed, it will stabilize the stack. Below is an example, with a Trinity followup in the third bag.
- TOJ Core: The O, S and Z pieces can always be placed in one of four ways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- ITS Core: There are three distinct products made from this setup. One can always stack the second bag depending on the placement of JO in the first bag. In the third bag, a T-Spin Triple or Imperial Cross is possible, depending if O precedes S or vice versa.
|
|
|
|
|
|
C-Spin Perfect Clear
ZST Core
This continuation is discovered by the player Chopin. If one can manage to get a flat 6-high-mino stack, they might have a chance to trade the T-Spin Double for a Perfect Clear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If one cannot execute a Perfect Clear after 6 lines, there still may be a chance of a PC after 8 lines (PC rate: 74.72 %). If that also fails, it can be continued with a T-Spin Triple, Imperial Cross or STMB Cave.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOJ Core
One may assemble the C-Spin Perfect Clear using the TOJ Core.
- O → ZL (PC rate: 95.00%): This form has better Perfect Clear solutions than the ZST Core C-Spin since the chance of doing a T-Spin Double before Perfect Clear is significantly better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- L → I (PC rate: 94.09%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
TZJ Core (Aitch's variation)
Here is another way of stacking the first bag. This will always work if the I piece comes early, although TKI 3 is more appropriate for that dependency. The J piece is on hold.
|
This pattern has many continuations depending on the piece order of the second bag.
- L → O, I → Z - PC rate: 89.25 % (12 solutions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- S → LO → Z - PC rate: 96.90 % (12 solutions)
|
|
|
|
- S → L, OI → Z - PC rate: 80.00 % (8 solutions)
|
|
|
|
- O → ZL, S → I - PC rate: 91.19 % (7 solutions)
|
|
|
|
|
- ZO → L → S - PC rate: 93.02 % (10 solutions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- S → Z → O - PC rate: 89.33 % (21 solutions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- I → L - PC rate: 88.02 % (11 solutions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
See also
External Links
- Post about 8-row Perfect Clear Setups, especially C-Spin.